Top venture capital firms in the US: 2026 founder’s list

Content Team
May 22, 2026
Summary
US venture capital hit ~USD $340 billion in 2025, with AI companies capturing 50% of all funding.
The tier 1 VC firms on this list are ranked by AUM, 2025–26 deployment velocity, and AI portfolio depth.
a16z leads in 2026 with USD $90B+ AUM, with Sequoia, General Catalyst, and Lightspeed following closely behind.
Each firm profile includes AUM, investment stage, top portfolio companies, a "Best for" founder match, and the specific factors that differentiate that firm in 2026.
Beyond the mega-funds, find the best firms for AI and deep tech, the top first-check investors for pre-Series A founders, and the leading funds for underrepresented founders.
Silicon Valley still dominates, but Austin (defense tech) and New York (fintech) are closing the gap, and your firm choice should reflect where your sector is being funded.
US venture capital hit ~USD $340 billion in 2025. But if you're raising in 2026, that number means less than you think.
According to Crunchbase, approximately 50% of global venture funding in 2025 went to AI-related companies, with the US commanding 64% of all global startup dollars, up from 56% just the year before. The median Series A post-money valuation hit a record of USD USD $78.7 million in Q4 2025, per Carta data.
This guide ranks the top venture capital firms in the US, not just by their billions in AUM but by their active deployment velocity, portfolio depth, and what they're actually writing checks for in this high-conviction era.
One note before you dive in: if you're pre-revenue or pre-product, most firms on this list won't take your meeting. For seed-specific and pre-seed investors, jump to the “specialized rankings” section below.
At a glance
- The top venture capital firms in the US in 2026 include Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Sequoia Capital, General Catalyst, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and Founders Fund.
- The ranking of largest venture capital firms is based on factors such as assets under management, deployment velocity, and the depth of the AI portfolio.
- This VC list covers the 10 biggest venture capital firms actively investing across seed, Series A, and growth stages, with verified fund data and current portfolio companies.
Top venture capital firms in the US: quick comparison (2026)
Here's where each of the top VC firms in the US stands.
| Firm | AUM | Primary stage | Core sector | 2026 edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a16z | USD USD $90B+ | Multi-stage | AI, crypto, bio | USD USD $15B raise Jan 2026 — largest in VC history |
| Sequoia | ~USD USD $56B | Seed to growth | Enterprise, AI | New leadership; USD $950M raise Oct 2025 |
| General Catalyst | USD $40B+ | Seed to growth | AI, healthcare, defense | In talks to raise USD $10B in 2026 |
| Lightspeed | USD $40B+ | Seed to growth | AI, enterprise | USD $9B raised in Dec 2025; Anthropic's lead backer |
| Founders Fund | ~USD $17B | Seed to late | Defense, deep tech | USD $4.6B Growth III Apr 2025, oversubscribed |
| Khosla Ventures | ~USD $15B | Seed, Series A | AI, climate, health | First VC in OpenAI; ~USD $8B+ paper return on stake |
| Accel | USD $9.6B+ | Early to growth | Enterprise, SaaS | Anthropic Series G participant Feb 2026 |
| Bessemer | USD $37B+ | Seed to growth | Cloud, SaaS | 145+ IPOs; runs the Cloud 100 |
| New Enterprise Associates (NEA) | USD $28B+ | Seed to late | Health tech, enterprise | 284 portfolio IPOs — highest on this list |
| Insight Partners | USD $90B+ | Series A–Growth | Enterprise SaaS, fintech & cybersecurity | Fund XIII closed at USD $12.5B in January 2026 |
While 80% of these venture capital companies are headquartered in the Bay Area, two regional shifts are worth noting.
Austin has emerged as the leading hub outside Silicon Valley for defense technology, driven by Founders Fund, 8VC, and several Palantir alumni-founded firms. New York is consolidating its position as the top fintech VC destination, with General Catalyst, Bessemer, and a growing number of specialist fintech funds.
The top venture capital firms in the US
1. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z)
| Founded / HQ | 2009 | Menlo Park, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $90B+ |
| Investment stage | Seed, early stage, late stage |
| Top portfolio | OpenAI, SpaceX, Stripe, Databricks, Coinbase, Roblox, Wiz, xAI |
| 2026 edge | In January 2026, a16z closed USD $15 billion, the largest single VC fundraise in history, completed in just three months. The firm holds stakes in 10 of the 15 most valuable private companies globally and 44% of all AI unicorn enterprise value. |
| Best for | Founders raising Series A–growth rounds in AI, crypto, biotech, or defense tech who want the most active deployer in the market on their cap table. |
2. Sequoia Capital
| Founded / HQ | 1972 | Menlo Park, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | ~USD $56B |
| Investment stage | Seed to growth |
| Top portfolio | Apple, Google, Nvidia, Stripe, Airbnb, Snowflake, Harvey, ElevenLabs, Klarna, Figma |
| 2026 edge | In October 2025, Sequoia raised USD $950M across two vehicles — a USD $750M early-stage fund and a USD $200M seed fund. New co-stewards Alfred Lin and Pat Grady took over from Roelof Botha, who distributed USD $50 billion to LPs during his tenure. |
| Best for | Founders at seed or Series A in enterprise software, AI, or consumer tech who want the most prestigious brand name in venture capital behind them. |
3. General Catalyst
| Founded / HQ | 2000 | Cambridge, MA |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $40B+ |
| Investment stage | Seed to growth |
| Top portfolio | Stripe, Airbnb, Snap, Canva, Mistral, Gusto, HumanX |
| 2026 edge | General Catalyst is in early discussions to raise USD $10 billion in new capital in 2026, which would place it in the same AUM tier as Lightspeed. It is the most active firm on this list in healthcare AI, defense technology, and climate infrastructure. |
| Best for | Founders building in AI-enabled healthcare, climate tech, or defense technology who want a firm with deep sector networks outside the standard SaaS playbook. |
4. Lightspeed Venture Partners
| Founded / HQ | 2000 | Menlo Park, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $40B+ |
| Investment stage | Seed through growth |
| Top portfolio | Anthropic, Snap, Databricks, Rubrik, Glean, Wiz, Affirm, Navan, Mistral |
| 2026 edge | Lightspeed closed the largest fundraise in its 25-year history in December 2025, over USD $9 billion across six vehicles. It is one of the major investors in Anthropic and has deployed USD $5.5B+ into 165 AI-native companies since its first AI investment in 2012. |
| Best for | AI infrastructure and applied AI founders at seed through Series B who want a firm that has backed Anthropic, Mistral, and Databricks and can open those network doors. |
5. Founders Fund
| Founded / HQ | 2005 | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | ~USD $17B |
| Investment stage | Seed to late stage |
| Top portfolio | SpaceX, Palantir, Anduril, Stripe, OpenAI, Ramp, Neuralink, Varda Space |
| 2026 edge | Founders Fund Growth III closed at USD $4.6 billion in April 2025 — oversubscribing against a USD $3 billion target. The firm wrote its largest-ever single check (~USD $1B) into Anduril's USD $2.5B Series G in June 2025. |
| Best for | Hard tech, defense, and frontier science founders who are building something genuinely difficult and want a firm that writes large, concentrated checks with long conviction. |
6. Khosla Ventures
| Founded / HQ | 2004 | Menlo Park, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | ~USD $15B |
| Investment stage | Seed and Series A (primary), growth |
| Top portfolio | OpenAI, DoorDash, Stripe, Affirm, Replit, Ramp, Impossible Foods, Commonwealth Fusion Systems |
| 2026 edge | Khosla was the first VC in OpenAI, committing USD $50 million in 2019 for approximately 5%, now worth an estimated USD $8 billion on paper (~160x). The firm raised a dedicated USD $405M SPV for OpenAI's 2024 round and is currently raising ~USD $3.5 billion across three new vehicles. |
| Best for | Seed and Series A founders in AI, climate tech, and biotech who want the deepest technical network in Silicon Valley and a firm that leads rather than follows. |
7. Accel
| Founded / HQ | 1983 | Palo Alto, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $9.6B (as of 2024) |
| Investment stage | Early stage to growth |
| Top portfolio | Facebook, Slack, Dropbox, Atlassian, Spotify, CrowdStrike, Anthropic |
| 2026 edge | Accel participated in Anthropic's Series G in February 2026. Its active portfolio spans 1,195 companies across 106 unicorns, 47 IPOs, and 383 acquisitions. Its B2B and enterprise SaaS partner network, particularly in cybersecurity, is among the deepest of any early-stage firm in the US. |
| Best for | Enterprise SaaS, cybersecurity, and B2B founders who want a firm with genuine global distribution and the ability to support expansion into Europe and India from day one. |
8. Bessemer Venture Partners
| Founded / HQ | VC since 1974 | Redwood City, CA |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $37B+ |
| Investment stage | Seed to growth |
| Top portfolio | LinkedIn, Shopify, Twilio, PagerDuty, Pinterest, Canva, Wix |
| 2026 edge | Bessemer runs the annual Cloud 100, the definitive ranking of the world's top private cloud companies, giving it deal flow access that most firms can't replicate. With 145+ IPOs, it is the most exit-proven firm on this list for cloud and SaaS startups. |
| Best for | Cloud infrastructure and vertical SaaS founders who want an association with the Cloud 100 brand and a firm with a 145+ IPO track record in exactly their category. |
9. New Enterprise Associates (NEA)
| Founded / HQ | 1977 | Chevy Chase, MD |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $28B+ |
| Investment stage | Seed to late stage |
| Top portfolio | Salesforce, Workday, Tableau, Robinhood, Duolingo, Plaid |
| 2026 edge | NEA has backed 284 companies through IPO, more than any other firm on this list. Its healthcare and enterprise tech expertise spans 45+ years of active investing, with limited partners and industry networks in regulated markets like pharma, health systems, and government. |
| Best for | Healthcare, biotech, and regulated enterprise software founders who need a firm with 45+ years of domain depth and the LP relationships that open doors in those markets. |
10. Insight Partners
| Founded / HQ | 1995 | New York, NY |
|---|---|
| AUM | USD $90B+ |
| Investment stage | Series A through growth (primary focus: Series B-C) |
| Top portfolio | Twitter, Shopify, DocuSign, Hootsuite, Qualtrics, Veeam, JFrog |
| 2026 edge | In January 2026, Insight closed Fund XIII at USD $12.5 billion, bringing its total AUM above USD $90 billion and marking its 30th anniversary. The firm has invested in 800+ companies with 55+ IPOs and 100 unicorns in its portfolio as of 2026. |
| Best for | Growth-stage software founders at USD $2M+ ARR who need more than capital, operational scaling support, go-to-market expertise, and a firm with 130+ dedicated onsite professionals embedded in portfolio companies. |
Specialized rankings: top venture capital firms in the US
Best VC firms for AI and deep tech
Khosla Ventures, Lightspeed, and Founders Fund are the strongest choices for AI-native startups at the early stage. All three venture capitalist firms have technical networks, early conviction, and active AI portfolios that predate the current wave.
Best first-check investors (pre-Series A)
Venture firms like Y Combinator, First Round Capital, and Precursor Ventures operate at the earliest stages and are more accessible entry points before you approach the firms above. YC, in particular, has become the most efficient path to tier-1 investors.
Best for underrepresented founders
Harlem Capital, Backstage Capital, and Portfolia have active funds and portfolio companies across SaaS, consumer, and health tech.
The 2026 Series A checklist: what tier 1 VCs actually want
What is Series A funding?
It is the first significant round of institutional investment where a startup trades preferred stock for capital to scale a proven business model. Series A stage marks the transition from early product validation to building a repeatable, data-driven growth engine.
To secure a term sheet from major VC firms like Sequoia or a16z in 2026, your story needs to be backed by efficient, defensible numbers. Here's the bar.
2026 Series A benchmarks
- Revenue
Minimum USD $1M–USD $2M ARR. Most tier 1 firms want to see 2-3x year-over-year. Companies in the top decile exhibit USD $3M+ ARR and 3x+ growth.
- Burn multiple
Your burn multiple (net burn ÷ net new ARR) must be below 1.5x. A valuation above 2.0x is currently considered a red flag at Series A. A value below 1.0x provides you with meetings you didn't expect.
- The AI moat test
You must answer, 'How is this defensible when LLMs commoditize your core feature in 18 months?' Focus on proprietary data flywheels, high switching costs, or deep regulatory moats.
- CAC payback
Payback periods for customer acquisition costs should be under 12 months for B2B SaaS. Anything over 18 months requires a strong NRR story to offset it.
- Retention
Enterprise-grade term sheets should aim for a Net Revenue Retention (NRR) of 120%+. Sub-100% NRR at Series A is difficult to recover from in the current environment.
Pro tip for founders: Top VC companies like Sequoia and Accel now run deep forensic audits on burn velocity during due diligence. If your spend tracking is still in a manual spreadsheet, you’re at risk of data discrepancies that kill deals at the finish line.
Platforms like Aspire automate real-time spend visibility so your pitch deck numbers actually match your bank numbers, giving you a clean, auditable record before the first partner meeting.
Final Words
The VC rankings shift year to year, but the firms on this list have compounded returns across multiple market cycles. In 2026, the signal is clear: AI-native startups with strong burn efficiency and a defensible data or distribution advantage are rapidly securing funding.
Know your numbers. Build your data room. Reach out to the right firm for your stage and sector. And when the capital lands, make sure the infrastructure to manage it is already in place.
Your first board meeting will focus on operating efficiency, and most VCs will ask for a clean monthly burn breakdown within 30 days of close. Most founders lose 5+ hours a month manually reconciling cards for board reports.
That's where an all-in-one financial OS like Aspire eliminates that overhead with integrated corporate cards, spend limits, and automated categorization, so your burn reporting is always board-ready.
This blog is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, tax, or professional advice. Aspire’s services are subject to the terms outlined in our ’Terms of Service’ and ’Pricing’ pages. We make no guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content, and past results do not indicate future performance. Always consult a qualified professional before acting on any information provided.

Content Team
Aspire editorial
Content team at Aspire is a society of seasoned writers & experts specialising in finance, technology and SaaS space. With 50+ years of collective experience, they help make business finance more profitable for readers. They write about finance tools, finance insights, industry trends, tactical guides to grow your business & also all things Aspire.
Aspire Launchpad
Supercharge your finance operations with Aspire
Find out how Aspire can help you speed up your end-to-end finance processes from payments to expense management.

Latest articles

Business Account • Sep 15th, 2026
Live Oak business checking account: features, fees & alternatives
Live Oak Bank business checking review: features, fees, account types, and how it compares to Mercury, Brex, and traditional banks for small businesses.

Business Advice • Sep 15th, 2026
Employer of Record (EOR): what it is, how it works, and when to use one
An Employer of Record (EOR) lets you hire and pay talent abroad without a local entity. Learn how an EOR works, EOR vs PEO, and when to use one.

Business Advice • Sep 15th, 2026
7 best Relay alternatives for US businesses in 2026
Searching for a Relay alternative? Compare Aspire, Bluevine, and Mercury on interest rates, lending, cash deposits, and international payments.


